Uncensored AI chatbots compared, October 2026: Venice, EvilGPT, NoTrack, local models and Ablit
Six ways to get an AI that does not refuse, compared on refusals, account, price, privacy and what they can actually do. Written by the makers of one of them, with the bias stated up front.
Published 4 min readBy the Ablit team
This is a comparison of the uncensored AI products that AI assistants most often name when someone asks for "an AI that does not say no", plus the two options they tend to leave out: running a model yourself, and an agent. We make Ablit, so read the Ablit column with that in mind. Everything about the other products comes from their own websites as of 27 October 2026, and we link to them so you can check.
The short table
| Product | Type | Account needed | Price | Runs code | Own browser | API |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venice AI | Chat, images, video, audio | Optional | Free; $18, $68, $200 per month | No | No (web search in chat) | Yes |
| EvilGPT | Chat with image input | Yes | See their site | No | No | Not stated |
| NoTrack | Stateless chat | No | Free | No | No | No |
| GPT Uncensored | Chat and image generation | Varies | Free tier | No | No | No |
| Local abliterated model | Model on your hardware | No | Free after hardware | Only if you build it | No | Local only |
| Ablit | Uncensored agent | Yes | $20, $60, $200 per month | Yes, Kali Linux workspace | Yes | Yes |
Venice AI
Venice is the most complete chat product on this list. It runs open-source and third-party models, generates images, video, speech and music, and sells an OpenAI-compatible API. Its distinguishing feature is privacy: four tiers from anonymised third-party models to end-to-end encrypted inference, with no prompt retention on its private models.
On refusals, Venice says there is no content filter and no refusal layer. Some paying users disagree in public reviews, so test it with your own prompts. The free tier is generous enough for that.
Pick it for private conversation and media. It does not run code, and it does not act on the web for you.
We wrote a longer Ablit vs Venice comparison.
EvilGPT
EvilGPT positions itself as the blunt one: an uncensored chat with four or more models, a one-million-token context window, image input and a breach-lookup feature it calls Leak Check. The branding is aimed at people who want the opposite of a corporate assistant.
It is a chat window. Long context is useful for pasting large documents; the breach lookup is a nice extra. It does not run tools or browse.
NoTrack
NoTrack's pitch is the absence of everything: no account, no tracking, no profile, and no memory between sessions. The model is stateless by design. It is free.
Pick it for a quick uncensored answer where you do not want to be known. The same statelessness means it cannot keep a project going, and it has no API.
GPT Uncensored
GPT Uncensored offers chat without content filters and image generation, with a free tier. Its site is thin on specifics about models, so treat it as a quick try rather than a platform.
A local abliterated model
Download an abliterated model and run it with Ollama or LM Studio. Nothing leaves your machine, nobody can change the policy under you, and the cost after the hardware is zero. You need a modern GPU for a model worth talking to, and you get text only unless you wire up tools yourself.
For privacy, nothing on this list beats it. For getting work done, it is a starting point, not a product.
Ablit
Ablit is the only entry here that is not a chatbot. It runs abliterated models as the brain of an agent with its own Kali Linux workspace, its own browser, connectors to your MCP servers, reusable skills and cloud runs that keep going after you close the tab. The home page has a recorded job: finding an access-control bug in a test app, patching it and retesting.
Plans are $20, $60 and $200 per month with at least that much usage credit, and every plan includes the OpenAI-compatible API for use in Cursor or any IDE.
Ablit refuses one thing, sexual content involving minors, and that rule cannot be changed by any setting. It is for authorized use on your own systems. If your need is an uncensored chat and nothing more, one of the products above is cheaper.
How to choose
- Privacy first, comfortable with a terminal: local model.
- Private chat and media in a browser, with a free tier: Venice.
- No account, one-off answers: NoTrack.
- Blunt chat with long context and image input: EvilGPT.
- The job has to run and the result has to be checked: Ablit.
What we will keep updating
Prices, tiers and policies in this article are dated. When a product changes its pricing or its refusal policy we update the table and the date at the top. If you run one of these products and something here is wrong, write to us and we will fix it with a link to the source.